Atrielle is being built to track the activity around an Ontario matter — court, tribunal, email, calendar, evidence, documents — and show the file state: due, missing, stale, blocked, satisfied, or waiting on instructions.
Schedule “A” · Part 1What Atrielle makes visible
Superior Court
Atrielle keeps filed materials, affidavits, endorsements, Case Center bundle readiness, page references, and documents accepted for filing but not yet in the bundle in one reviewable thread.
Civil litigation
Undertakings, advisements, refusals, production gaps, evidence references, client requests, and follow-up emails become visible instead of living across notes and inbox threads.
Workplace files
Union-side files turn on documents, evidence, member communications, and instructions from the union client. Atrielle keeps review requests and sign-off loops attached to the relevant source trail.
Schedule “A” · Part 2What Atrielle tracks
Atrielle turns working signals around a file into source-backed items a lawyer can review.
Each item carries the source, reason, support status, and review state, so the next conversation starts from the file rather than from memory.
Rules of Civil Procedure deadlines, timetable orders, endorsements, mediation dates, pre-trials, OLRB notices, and response windows surfaced with the source nearby.
Outstanding answers, documentary productions, refusal follow-up, missing authorizations, and satisfied items shown as file state.
Filed materials, bundle readiness, page references, documents accepted for filing but not yet in the bundle, sworn affidavits, and tab or exhibit gaps before the court appearance becomes urgent.
Applications, responses, mediation, consultations, hearing notices, production asks, Registrar correspondence, and union-client instructions kept close to the relevant trail.
Schedule “A” · Part 3Practice fit
Solo practices and small firms that need one place to carry pleadings, productions, undertakings, client instructions, deadlines, and follow-through.
High-volume civil litigation and labour and employment boutiques carrying dense court, tribunal, evidence, and client-sign-off work.
Clinics coordinating lawyers, students, intake, and administration across Files without a large-firm technology stack.
Outlook-first practices where file state is scattered across lawyer email, assistant follow-up, calendars, PDFs, and working folders.
Schedule “A” · Part 4Ontario technology context
Ontario practice is full of procedural signals that sit outside one neat system: court dates, Case Center bundle readiness, service and filing steps, discovery follow-up, OLRB forms, response materials, hearing notices, client instructions, and board correspondence.
The commentary to rule 3.1-2 of the Law Society of Ontario's Rules of Professional Conduct asks lawyers to understand the technology they rely on — its benefits, its risks, and its confidentiality implications. Atrielle is designed to be understood that way: the signal is useful because the source stays visible.
Schedule “A” · Part 5Working session
Working sessions start on a structured sample matter; a properly scoped live file comes later, with NDAs and data-handling terms in place — the same gating as our pilots.
The most useful files have real procedural texture: a large document set, evidence gaps, a motion record, a Case Center bundle, an OLRB response, a client or union sign-off loop, or a set of aging follow-up emails — enough for you to judge whether Atrielle catches what a good clerk, assistant, or associate would want on the screen.
Book a working sessionTell us where your lawyers and staff lose time. We will start with a few repeated workloads and shape the deployment around the systems your firm already controls.